Ref Review – Southampton see red whilst Liverpool and Watford harshly done by

Another new feature to celebrate our re-launch at The Offside Rule Podcast as Rich Laverty looks at the weekly officiating. Referees are always good talking points and why wouldn’t you hammer a referee or a linesman if you got the chance? Everybody else does! Each week we’ll review five of the biggest, most controversial or damn right ridiculous decisions made by officials throughout the weekend, right here on our website. This week: Ryan Bertrand, Raheem Sterling and a decision in the Championship on Friday night that couldn’t go unnoticed.

Embed from Getty Images

Ryan Bertrand sees red

Southampton fans may have been frustrated and angry by the decision to send Ryan Bertrand off in the final few minutes against Swansea, but they can have no real complaints about the decision made by referee Michael Oliver. Whilst there was clearly no malice in the tackle, Bertrand appeared to show the frustration that had built up as the Saints threw away a chance to go back to 3rd.

Ronald Koeman’s side had dominated the game for large parts, while Swansea had their backs to the wall throughout. Bertrand’s foot rolled over the top of the ball and it turned into a dangerous challenge from the left-back. It just compounded what had been a bad weekend for Southampton, with their rivals flourishing – but nobody can have any complaints. Oliver got that one spot on.

Mesut Ozil was offside…just

Whilst it ended up mattering little, Mesut Ozil’s disallowed goal during Arsenal’s 5-0 victory over the woeful Aston Villa, was just about the correct decision from whistler Anthony Taylor. Albeit, Arsenal were only 1-0 up at the time and being Arsenal, throwing the game away against Villa was a distinct possibility so hearts would have sank when the flag went up after Ozil had beaten Brad Guzan.

Whilst it was close, Ozil was fractionally offside in my opinion but made up for it with a lovely finish shortly after. The Gunners went on to win 5-0 with Ozil the main man. Undoubtedly, Robin van Persie’s goal against Leicester should also have been disallowed – once again proving the fine margins between wrong and right.

The Hand of Ahmed

I don’t think anybody quite knew why Ahmed Elmohamady’s goal was disallowed on Saturday lunchtime until closer inspection on replay. Newcastle’s protests couldn’t be seen live as the BT Sport camera was on the Egyptian, who wheeled away in delight after putting Hull level.

Whilst Phil Dowd didn’t act, his assistant did and together they came to undoubtedly the correct decision. On closer inspection, it couldn’t be clearer that the winger punched the ball into the back of Tim Krul’s net in an attempt that would have left Diego Maradona impressed.

However, one question did pop into my head. If a defender intentionally stops a goal with his hand, it’s a straight red card. Should it be the same for attackers who use their hand to score a goal?

Sterling denied

The last thing we need is another young, English talent grabbing a reputation for being a ‘diver’. But on Saturday the only thing that Joey O’Brien was grabbing, was a chunk of Raheem Sterling’s shirt. Sterling picked the ball up with back to goal and O’Brien already began to man-handle the attacker.

As Sterling weaved his way past the defender, O’Brien still had a hold of him, before Sterling finally fell to the ground inside the area. I can understand why referee Andre Marriner didn’t give it, Sterling seemed to go down in frustration at being held and it did appear theatrical, but O’Brien had hold of him for what seemed like an eternity! The theory of ‘if you don’t go down, you don’t get a pen’ is a silly one – Sterling was fouled and should have had the decision in his favour before he’d even hit the deck.

Gabriele Angella

With a rare lack of bad decisions in the Premier League, it would be unfair to miss out one of the worst decisions of the weekend in the Championship. People were barely starting their time off, when Bournemouth faced Watford on Friday night in what (on paper at least) looked like an exciting clash.

But the game was over as a contest less than 30 seconds in, when Hornets defender Gabriele Angella brought down Callum Wilson, as the striker ran through on goal. Angella was late, reckless and it was definitely a yellow but the referee deemed it as a goalscoring opportunity.

The sticking point was Craig Cathcart. Angella’s partner at the back was covering him and would arguably have been able to challenge Wilson’s run in on the Watford net. It was a rash and wrong decision to send Angella off and one that killed the game instantaneously.

Follow @RichJLaverty

Advertisements

11 Comments on Ref Review – Southampton see red whilst Liverpool and Watford harshly done by

  1. It’s all very well having red cards rescinded but damage is done ! Potential for three points has probably been lost. The game to a neutral no longer has meaning . Judging the true worth of both teams difficult.
    Joe Public has paid out anything from £15 to £70 to watch and the entertainment for one side completely ruined.
    The officials get off scot free ! Rarely a ban for their unprofessional conduct. Smack on a wrist hidden from view.
    The thing is the dodgy refs are known ! When you see the appointed officials you know in advance the potential for calamity is huge…and you are usually right !
    The really bad refs get rewarded however..they gain senior jobs managing the nuthouse after they retire. Don’t they Mike ?

  2. Not only was Angella covered by his other centre half but the ball was way out of reach of the forward and in to the keepers hands. Have you seen the stats for Mr Probert a Bournemouth fan in their games – absolute disgrace.

  3. Also with the Watford decision the fact that Wilson punted the ball so far ahead he would never have caught it and therefore there never really was a goalscoring opportunity at all (let alone a clear one!)

  4. Re: the Angella Error. Isn’t it time sendings off were replaced by a sin bin? You can wrongly be red-carded in the first minute and your team is reduced to 10 men for the whole 90 minutes. However if you commit the same foul in the 91st minute your team may not even have to restart with 10 men. In either case the ban may be for the same number of matches. The length of time in the sin bin could be set according to the seriousness of the offence and there could be an option to only allow a substitute to replace the offender. This will even up the penalty to the team and will give the 4th official something to do!!

  5. What happens to Probert?

  6. WatfordFcRob7 // February 3, 2015 at 12:52 pm // Reply

    The Angella sending off was without a doubt the second worst footballing decision ever (the first being that ghost goal being “scored” by Reading – also against Watford) & it’s about time that referees & their assistants started getting majorly punished for ruining games by making such awful decisions!

    Glad to know that Lee “I support Bournemouth” Probert will not be taking part in any officiating for the next couple of rounds of any football games, but the only question I have is –
    is he still being paid whilst he isn’t doing anything? Because if that’s the case then it’s just like he’s been given a holiday as a reward for his total incompetency!

    The Bournemouth Vs Watford match should be replayed because of that disgraceful decision so that Watford can actually have a fighting chance of winning the game! If Bournemouth were to then still win it then I would be one of the first to congratulate them!

  7. WatfordfcRob7. Probably the third worst decision. How about the penalty Leicester were given in the play off semi final against Watford when Knockhaert threw himself to the ground with no contact.

  8. Scummer Rich // February 3, 2015 at 1:29 pm // Reply

    I think your point about red cards for intentional hand balls “scoring” a goal is valid. A yellow card felt too lenient for such a shameless act of cheating. The celebration is just appalling.

    Likewise, I would like to see more referees start to blow for holding in the area although a pen always seems harsh. I wonder if a rule change for this is an idea. Giving indirect free kicks unless clear goal scoring? Same for unintentional handballs stopping a shot on target?

  9. every wrong card they do three match ban then let them see what it like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: